German Conspiracy

-
I am reading Eberhard Bethge's biography of Dietrich Bonhoeffer and as he was involved in the coup attempts in Germany I learn some about them.

In general, it is important to understand that there were fairly large sections of the Germany population that were against Hitler and the Nazi party, especially regarding the SS and their brutality in military actions. But they were the minority and it was not safe to voice dissent. Wilhelm Canaris was the head of the Abwehr, the German military intelligence service, and he was one of the leaders in the conspiracy. He is the picture to the right. (He, Oster and Bonhoeffer were all executed together in 1945).

In September 1939, Warsaw surrendered and Hitler ordered preparations for the invasion of Holland and Belgium. The conspirators hoped that this would wake up the other generals and that they would take an overthrow of Hitler over WWII. And, information about the SS atrocities in Poland began to circulate. "Of course, the ordinary citizen assumed that the appalling stories were foreign propaganda; at first he could not, and then he would not, believe them." Canaris, together with General Blaskowitz, the military commander in Poland, gave the other generals accounts of the SS atrocities:
What the foreign radio stations have broadcast up to now is only a tiny fraction of what has actually happened ... The only possibility of fending off this pestilence lies in bringing the guilty parties and their followers under military command and military justice with all possible speed.
Hitler responded by recalling Blaskowitz from his post, denouncing his concerns as "childish."

 Hans von Dohnanyi, Dietrich's brother-in-law, was in charge of a record of Hitler's evil deeds, 'chronicle of shame' with the idea that if at some point they could overthrow or even arrest Hitler, they would have a record of their reasons.

He also made connections with a Munich lawyer named Dr. Josef Muller, who was on friendly terms with the Vatican. He was "installed" by Canaris in the German Military Intelligence and assigned to its Munich office. His real job was negotiate with Great Britain through the Vatican. Great Britain "was prepared to agree to an armistice before an attack in the west and after Hitler's removal."

Then Dohnanyi took Muller's information and his record and drafted a memo, reviewed by a very small group including Bonhoeffer, summarizing the reasons for quick action. It was given to General Halder and commander in chief of the army Brauchitsch. However, Brauchitsch's reaction was "you ought not have submitted that to me! What is happening here is absolute treason." Halder took responsibility and Brauchitsch's didn't want to arrest him. So, the "chance passed that a still undefeated Germany might negotiate terms with the Allied Powers." Muller informed the Vatican that the attempt had fallen through, and the feared offensive was to be expected.

So what was it like with Bonhoeffer during these times. Bethge contrasts the 1932 Bonhoeffer (Life Together and Discipleship) and the 1939 Bonhoeffer (to be expressed in Ethics and Letters and Papers). He writes:
In 1932 Bonhoeffer moved into the community of Christians which was confined to the group within the church that protested publically with him. Nineteen thirty-nine led him into an even more restricted circle of kindred spirits. From that time on the members of Finkenwalde felt there was something incognito about his existence that they mustn't question. For the new companions, on the other hand, his Christian existence seldom emerged openly. Whether among his old friends or his new ones, he instinctively hid the other side of his being. Anyone who had anything to do with him sensed that there was more there than could be seen; but no one had the impression of any inner conflict. Everything was in order.  
He goes on to say that the sacrifice demanded of him in 1939 was entirely different than the one of 1932 ... "the sacrifice of his Christian reputation."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Hearth

-
Image
"A stove used to furnish more than mere warmth. It was a focus, a hearth, a place that gathered the work and leisure of a family and gave the house a center. Its coldness marked the morning, and the spreading of its warmth the beginning of the day. It assigned to the different family members tasks that defined their place in the household. The mother built the fire, the children kept the firebox filled, and the father cut the firewood. It provided for the entire family a regular and bodily engagement with the rhythm of the seasons that was woven together of the threat of cold and solace of warmth, the smell of wood smoke, the exertion of sawing and of carrying, the teaching of skills and the fidelity to daily tasks." (Albert Borgmann: Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life ) So what is our new center? Warmth is now provided in a completely uniform way requiring no demands on our skill, strength or attention. In fact, the warmth device (central heating system) is c...
Read more

Idolatry in the West

-
"in order to promote killing in civilized societies it must be legalized under deceitful names. Yet liberal societies seem happy to be deceived exactly to the degree to which they have developed into societies of covetousness." Ok ... I know you need more before you know where this is going ... I am reading a book of essays on the ten commandments. This is in a section talking about the relatedness of all ten commandments, primarily through the command not to murder. He goes from there to make the point that we are a society dominated by want and covetousness and the more the claws of greed entangle us (from human traffiking to slave labor for our cheap consumer goods, to "designer babies" and whatever else technology deems to sell) the more we will redefine sin and morality. Bernd Wannenwetsch continues: "the culture of death is essentially marked by the business of redefinition. In defining our own humanity we claim the property rights that entitle us to dist...
Read more